Production of a Symbiotic Biopreparation (Mixture of Agave fourcroydes Lem. Pulp and PROBIOLACTIL®) for Use in Calves
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Context: Artificial calf breeding may lead to gastric disorders in animals, which are produced due to inappropriate nutritional practices.
Objective: Production of a Symbiotic Biopreparate (Mixture of Agave fourcroydes Lem. Pulp and PROBIOLACTIL®) in Calves.
Methods: The design and optimization of this biopreparation was based on the response surface method, with a rotating central composite experimental design 22, and two replications. Henequen pulp was used with the addition of molasses and yeast hydrolyzate, as sources of sugar and nitrogen, respectively, and PROBIOLACTIL® for supplementation of Lactobacillus salivarius. The experiment lasted 28 days, with a completely randomized design, to evaluate the effect of this additive on the productive and health indicators of Mambi de Cuba calves, at weaning and breeding.
Results: Optimum values were achieved for the components of the biopreparation, which increased the production of Lactobacillus. The application of the additive improved live weight, mean daily gain, and weight gain, from the 21st day on, and its influence on health was seen through a reduction in the occurrence of diarrhea.
Conclusions: The biopreparation was designed from a probiotic culture of agroindustrial residues, then enriched with highly available national components. This symbiotic biopreparation may be used as a nutritional additive in weaned calves.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Usted es libre de:
- Compartir — copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato
- La licenciante no puede revocar estas libertades en tanto usted siga los términos de la licencia
Bajo los siguientes términos:
- Atribución — Usted debe dar crédito de manera adecuada , brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios . Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante.
- NoComercial — Usted no puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales .
- SinDerivadas — Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuir el material modificado.
Citas
Abreu y Abreu, A.T. (2014). Probióticos, prebióticos y simbióticos. Revista de Gastroenterología de México, 79(Supl.1), 17-18. Retrieved on March 12, 2018, from: http://www.revistagastroenterologiamexico.org/index.php?p=revista&tipo=pdf-simple&pii=X0375090614691212
Adjei-Fremah, S., Ekwemalor, K., Asiamah, E. K, Ismail, H., Ibrahim, S., & Worku, M. (2018) Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and global gene expression in dairy cows. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46:1, 257-263, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1292913
Alzahal, O., McGill, H., Kleinberg, A., Holliday, J. I., Hindrichsen, I. K., Duffield, T. F., & McBride, B.W. (2014). Use of a direct-fed microbial product as a supplement during the transition period in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci., 97 (11), 7102–7114, doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8248
Ángel, R., Dalloul, R.A., & Doerr, J. (2005). Metabolism and nutrition: Performance of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with a direct-fed microbial. Poult. Sci., 84, 1222–1231. Retrieved on March 12, 2018, from: https://primalac.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Angel-Reduced-Nutrient.pdf
Baines, D., Sumarah, M., Kuldau, G., Juba, J., Mazza, A., & Masson, L. (2013). Aflatoxin, fumonisin and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in calves and the effectiveness of Celmanax®/Dairyman's Choice™ applications to eliminate morbidity and mortality losses. Toxins, 5, 1872-1895, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins5101872
Bajagai, Y. S., Klieve, A. V, Dart. P. J., & Bryden, W.L. (2016). Probiotics in ruminant Nutrition. En: H.P.S. Makkar (Ed.), FAO Animal Production and Health Paper, (No. 179, pp. 37-48). Roma, Italia: FAO. Retrieved on March 12, 2018, from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5933e.pdf
Bartkiene, E., Bartkevics, V., Ikkere, L. E., Pugajeva, I. Zavistanaviciute, P., Lele, V., … Juodeikiene, G. (2018). The effects of ultrasonication, fermentation with Lactobacillus sp., and dehydration on the chemical composition and microbial contamination of bovine colostrum. J. Dairy Sci., 101(8), 6787–6798, doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-14692
Bertin, Y., Habouzit, C., Dunière, L., Laurier, M., Durand, L., Duchez, D., … Forano, E. (2017). Lactobacillus reuteri suppresses E. coli O157:H7 in bovine ruminal fluid: Toward a pre-slaughter strategy to improve food safety? PLoS ONE, 12(11), e0187229, doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187229
Bi, Y., Yang, Ch., Diao, Q., & Tu, Y. (2017). Effects of dietary supplementation with two alternatives to antibiotics on intestinal microbiota of preweaned calves challenged with Escherichia coli K99. Scientific Reports, 7 (5439). Retrieved on March 15, 2018, from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-05376-z
Box, G. E. P., Hunter, W. G., & Hunter, J. S. (1978). Statistics for experimenters: an introduction to design, data analysis, and model building. New York, USA: John Wiley y Sons.
Cabello, A. (1980). Utilización de los subproductos de la industria azucarera en la alimentación animal. Derivados de la caña de azúcar. ICIDCA: 393-419.
Calzadilla Dodd, D., Castro, A., Soto Márquez, E. Hernández Rodríguez, M., & Andrial, P. (1999). Ganadería tropical. La Habana, Cuba: Editorial Félix Varela.
Castañeda Guillot, C. (2018). Probióticos, puesta al día. Revista Cubana de Pediatría, 90(2), 286 – 298. Retrieved on March 15, 2018, from: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/ped/v90n2/ped09218.pdf
Castillo Duvergel, Y., & Miranda, I. (2014). COMPAPROP: Sistema para comparación de proporciones múltiples. Rev. Protección Veg., 29(3), 231-234. Retrieved on March 15, 2018, from: http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/rpv/v29n3/rpv13314.pdf
Corzo, G., & Gilliland, S.E. (1999). Bile salt hydrolase activity of three strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Dairy Sci., 82, 472-480, doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75256-2
Duncan, B. (1955). Multiple ranges and multiple F. Test. Biometrics, 11, 1-42.
FAO/OMS. (1-4 de octubre, 2001). Informe de la Consulta de Expertos FAO/OMS sobre Evaluación de las propiedades saludables y nutricionales de los probióticos en los alimentos, incluida la leche en polvo con bacterias vivas del ácido láctico. En Probióticos en los alimentos. Propiedades saludables y nutricionales y directrices para la evaluación. (No. 85). Córdoba, Argentina: Autor. Retrieved on March 15, 2018, from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-a0512s.pdf
Fernández, S., Fraga, M., Silveyra, E., Trombert, A. N., Rabaza, A., Pla, M., & Zunino, P. (2018). Probiotic properties of native Lactobacillus spp. strains for dairy calves. Beneficial Microbes, 9 (4), 613 - 624, doi: https://doi.org/10.3920/BM2017.0131
Flores, O. (2015). Efecto del PROBIOLACТIL® en indicadores productivos y de salud en terneros lactantes. (Trabajo Científico Técnico Salud y producción bovina). Universidad Agraria de La Habana, Cuba.
García Curbelo, Y., Bocourt, R., Savón, L. L., García Vieyra, M. I., & López, M. G. (2015). Prebiotic effect of Agave fourcroydes fructans: an animal model. Food Funct. 6(9), 3177–3182, doi: 10.1039/c5fo00653h
Koteswara Reddy, G., Mohana Lakshmi, S., Ashok Kumar, C. K., Satheesh Kumar, D., & Lakshmi Srinivas, T. (2013). Evaluation of anti-inflammatoy and antioxidant activity of methanolic extract of Agave. Journal of Global Trends in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4(4), 1300-1309. Retrieved on May 13, 2018, from: https://www.jgtps.com/admin/uploads/fvtXsn.pdf
Liepa, L., & Viduža, M. (2018). The effect of peroral administration of Lactobacillus fermentum culture on dairy cows health indices. Macedonian Veterinary Review, 41(2), 143-151. Retrieved on January 5, 2019, from https://www.macvetrev.mk/2018-2/macvetrev-2018-0017.pdf
Liew, S. L., Ariff, A. B., Raha, A. R., & Ho, Y. W. (2005). Optimization of medium composition for the production of a probiotic microorganism, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, using response surface methodology. International J. of Food Microbiol., 102, 137-142, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.009
MacPherson, C., Audy, J., Mathieu, O., & Tompkins, T. A. (2014). Multistrain probiotic modulation of intestinal epithelial cells’ immune response to a double stranded RNA ligand, poly (I·). Appl Environ Microb., 80(5), 1692–1700, Retrieved on March 16, 2018, from: https://aem.asm.org/content/aem/80/5/1692.full.pdf
Malacari, D. A. (2016). Guía para la crianza y mantenimiento de terneros privados de calostro para su utilización como modelo animal. Buenos Aires: INTA. Retrieved on March 16, 2018, from: https://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/inta_-_guia_para_la_crianza_y_mantenimeinto_de_terneros_privados_de_calostro_0.pdf
Malik, R., & Bandla, S. (2010). Effect of source and dose of probiotics and exogenous fibrolytic enzymes (EFE) on intake, feed efficiency, and growth of male buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42(6), 1263-1269, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-010-9559-5
Olagnero, G., Abad, A., Bendersky, S., Genevois, C., Granzella, L., & Montonati, M. (2007). Alimentos funcionales: fibra, prebióticos, probióticos y simbióticos. Diaeta, 25(121), 20- 33. Retrieved on March 15, 2018, from: http://andeguat.org.gt/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Alimentos-funcionales-fibra-prebi%C3%B3ticos-probi%C3%B3ticos-y-simbi%C3%B3ticos1.pdf
Pandey, R., Suresh, R. N., & Babu, V. (2015). Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics - a review. Association of Food Scientists y Technologists, 52(12), 7577-7587. Retrieved on January 8, 2019, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648921/
Pérez, M. Q., Milián, G., Piad, R. B., González, R.C., Bocourt, R. S., & Savón, V. (2006). Hidrolizado de fondaje de cubetas de destilerías de alcohol con un crudo enzimático de la cepa de Bacillus licheniformis E-44 y su procedimiento de obtención. Patente No. 23179. (Int.cl.8) A 23 J 1/00,3/30, C 12N 9/56.
Rodríguez Bernal, J. M., Serna Jiménez, J. A., Uribe Bohórquez, M. A, Klotz, B., & Quintanilla-Carvajal, M. X. (2014). Aplicación de la metodología de superficie de respuesta para evaluar el efecto de la concentración de azúcar y de cultivos iniciadores comerciales sobre la cinética de fermentación del yogurt. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química, 13(1), 213-225. Retrieved on June 16, 2018, from: www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/rmiq/v13n1/v13n1a17.pdf
Rondón, A. J., & Laurencio, M. (2008). Utilización de las mezclas de Exclusión Competitiva en la avicultura moderna. Rev. Cienc. Agríc., 42(1), 3-11. Retrieved on June 16, 2018, from: https://www.redalyc.org/html/1930/193015413001/
Saalfeld, M. H., Brayer Pereira, D. I., Silveira Valente, J. S., Lopes Borchardt, J. L., Weissheimer, C. F., Arocha Gularte, M., & Pereira Leivas Leite, F. (2016). Effect of anaerobic bovine colostrum fermentation on bacteria growth inhibition. Ciênc. Rural, 46(12), 2152–2157, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160393
Sánchez, L., Omura, M., Lucas, A., Pérez, T., Llanes, M., & Ferreira, C. de L. (2015). Strains of Lactobacillus spp. with probiotic capacity isolated from the intestinal tract of calves. Rev Salud Anim., 37(2), 94-104.
Satık, S., & Günal, M. (2017). Effects of kefir as a probiotic source on the performance and health of young dairy calves. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 5(2), 139-143. Retrieved on June 16, 2018, from: http://agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/download/978/467
Segura, A., & De Bloss, M. (2000). La alternativa a los promotores del crecimiento. En III Congreso Nacional de Avicultura. Memorias. (pp. 37-44). Varadero, Cuba: Centro de Convenciones Plaza América.
Signorini, M. L., Soto, L. P., Zbrun, M. V., Sequeira, G. J., Rosmini, M. R., & Frizzo, L.S. (2012). Impact of probiotic administration on the health and fecal microbiota of young calves: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of lactic acid bacteria. Res Vet Sci., 93(1), 250-258, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.05.001
Simmering, R., & Blaut, M. (2001). Pro- and prebiotics-the tasty guardian angles? Appl. Microbiol. Biotech., 55(1), 19-28, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530000512
Sosa Cossio, D., García Hernández, Y., & Mendoza Dustet, J. C. (2018). Development of probiotics for animal production. experiences in Cuba. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science, 52(4), 357-373. Retrieved on January 16, 2019, from: http://www.cjascience.com/index.php/CJAS/article/download/836/868
Statgraphics. (2002). Statgraphics Plus version 5.1. USA: Statgraphic Technical Support Center. Manugistics, Inc., Rockville, Maryland.
Thomas, D., & Elliott, E. (2013). Interventions for preventing diarrhea-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: systematic review. BMC Public Health, 3(13), 799, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-799
Uyeno, Y., Shigemori, S., & Shimosato, T. (2015). Effect of Probiotics/Prebiotics on cattle health and productivity. Microbes Environ, 30(2), 126–132, doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14176
Zapata, C. (2011). Valoración de los efectos del cultivo de lactobacilos (Vitafert) en la cría de terneros en Tabasco. (Tesis Maestría en Ciencias, especialista en Producción Agroalimentaria en el Trópico). Colegio de Postgraduados, México. Retrieved on May 16, 2017, from: http://hdl.handle.net/10521/581
Zhang, R., Zhou, M., Tu, Y., Zhang, N. F., Deng, K. D., Ma, T., & Diao, Q. Y. (2016). Effect of oral administration of probiotics on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility and stress-related indicators in Holstein calves. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 100 (1), 33-80, doi: 10.1111/jpn.12338